
The exhibition "Tea Culture of Japan: Chanoyu Past and Present" is closing this weekend. Be sure to go check it out if you haven't already!
Yale's Undergraduate Art and Art History Blog


Yale University Art Gallery
Robert L. McNeil, Jr., Lecture Hall
Free and open to the public
Space is limited; overflow seating with simulcast will be available.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/25/weekinreview/25kennedy.html?ref=design
Since at our last meeting we were discussing the interplay between high and low art, and my post last month dealt with the relationship between art and politics, I find it particularly timely to share the above article by Randy Kennedy, published yesterday in the New York Times regarding the hanging of Barack Obama’s portrait by street artist Shepard Fairey in the National Portrait Gallery in Washington D.C. The article raises many interesting points – to what degree is Fairey like Obama himself, in joining the establishment to change it, in heralding a new populism? – and most directly takes up the seeming incongruity of the incident, what Kennedy describes as the “establishment’s most public embrace of a quintessentially anti-establishment brand of art.” But the irony lies less with the National Portrait Gallery’s decision and moreover on the side of street artists. How can “anti-establishment” art remain such if it becomes part of the establishment? Is street art’s growing emergence within the domain of the museum merely giving into or rather a victory over high art?
Kennedy suggests that for Fairey and other “younger” artists, the museum is no different from YouTube or a public wall. Unlike the hostility of such street artists as Banksy (see more on Banksy in our recent issue of Dimensions), artists of Fairey’s generation embrace the establishment as yet another place for one’s art to be seen, thereby fulfilling the original goal of the graffiti artist. But I’m not sure if I am entirely convinced: there is something about Banksy’s rebellion (Kennedy describes Banksy’s furtive heist of MoMA in 2005) that makes him in my eyes more authentic, at least if street art wishes to claim the label “anti-establishment.” I think the question still remains: Is Banksy or Fairey truer to the ideals of street art? At what point does Fairey stop being an “outlaw”? And can we challenge and change best by joining the system or revolting against it?